Spreadsheets are intuitive, flexible, and transportable making them the medium of choice to perform tasks such as:
This is more difficult than it sounds since, the use of spreadsheets must be replaced by some validated process, such as Excel Spreadsheet Validation.
The replacement process can be a manual operating procedure which is often cumbersome and less efficient.
It is also possible to replace spreadsheets with targeted IT solutions.
The IT solutions however are never as flexible as a spreadsheet and must be validated (no small task).
Option 1 above requires a significant budget to purchase one or more IT solutions (often LIMS).
In addition, the company processes must be modified to fit the purchased solution, and employees must be trained to operate in the new environment.
A truism regarding IT solutions like LIMS is worth repeating:
“IT solutions are a lot like concrete, they can be configured in many shapes but once deployed are almost impossible to change.”
The point is that unlike spreadsheets which can be updated as your company grows and changes, IT solutions are often antiquated even before they are deployed.
Companies often find upwards of 200 spreadsheets which need to be validated and maintained.
A daunting endeavor.
Option 2 requires validating a large suite of spreadsheets. In addition, the spreadsheets must be maintained in a validated state and must be capable of rapid updates to support change within your company.
Attacking this problem one spreadsheet at a time is cost and time prohibitive.
To be successful, a company wide spreadsheet validation solution is required.
Like templates, documents are managed within a controlled, secure environment which provides lifecycle/status control.
In addition, changes to documents must be recorded in an audit trail and author/reviewer/approver signatures must be applied.
Three general categories are provided here:
The principles of file security, control, and 21 CFR Part 11 are well known and straight forward to implement, but taming and bringing into compliance the wide-ranging functionality of spreadsheets takes experience.
The goal is to bring your spreadsheets into compliance, not to start an open-ended research project.
The first validation component is the environment in which Templates and Documents are secured and maintained.
The second component is individual validation packages for each spreadsheet.
It is important to separate these components rather than execute a single validation exercise because new spreadsheets and revisions to existing spreadsheets must be expected as your business grows.
Handling spreadsheets as modular add-ins will make maintenance of your solution easier.
If you picked the Vendor Solution, your task is simplified by the documentation set provided by the vendor and denoted by an asterisk.
Item | Description |
---|---|
Validation Master Plan | |
User Requirements | High Level Business Requirements |
System Requirements Specification* | High Level Solution Requirements |
Design Qualification | Comparison of the User Requirements with the System Requirements |
Functional Requirements Specification * | How the solution implements the system requirements |
Design Specification * | Technical system definition |
Installation Qualification * | Documentation of successful installation |
Operational Qualification * | Report summarizing the testing executed to prove the solution functionality works as expected. |
Risk Assessment | Consider how the solution fits into the business environment and potential risks which may arise. |
Performance Qualification | Report summarizing testing performed which proves the solution operates as expected in the target environment. |
Summary Report and Release Statement | Report summarizing the validation process and a statement of release for production use |
GAMP categorizes spreadsheets into 5 categories depending on impact and complexity.
The documentation required for each category increases as the impact and/or complexity increases.
To avoid the complexity of managing different documentation sets across your portfolio, it is possible to assign the highest category of GAMP risk across all templates.
Categorizing individual templates can avoid full documentations sets for simpler templates BUT since simple templates are easy to document the savings are not large and compensated by a single well-defined process.
Item | Description |
---|---|
Validation Plan | A single plan should be created to cover all spreadsheets both new and revised. The plan should also define the template lifecycle. |
User/Functional/Design Requirements | Combined document delineating high level requirements, functionality employed to implement the requirements and design considerations. The document should include calculations, alert criteria, number of decimals displayed, automation deployed, data validation options, and significant format. |
Traceability | Between requirements and testing |
Test Plan | Defined testing and predetermined acceptance criteria |
Test Report | Documentation of testing performed |
Validation Report | Summarize the validation exercise. Include a summarization of previous template versions and testing performed on each version. |
Item | Description |
---|---|
Required Changes and Risk Assessment | Define the required changes and assess against criteria defined in the “Validation Plan” |
Test Plan | Defined testing and predetermined acceptance criteria |
Test Report | Documentation of testing performed |
Traceability | Between requirements and testing |
Validation Report | Summarize the validation exercise. Include a summarization of previous template versions and testing performed on each version. |
Reach out to Schedule a Meeting and get more information about how SciCord can fit into your lab
Don’t take our word for it.
We exceed our client’s demands everyday to make their research and discovery process simpler and more efficient.
This is by far the best value in science software (or anything else in science, really) that we’ve ever experienced. Other solutions in this price range had a fraction of the features, and those with the features cost 3x – 10x more. We’re very happy customers.
Josh Guyer,
Senior Pharmaceutical Scientist